After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 578780 - crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Clicked rapidly on diffe...
crash in Evolution Mail and Calendar: Clicked rapidly on diffe...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 557613
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.26.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
: 586824 587727 588420 591875 591877 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-04-12 19:00 UTC by Gilles Dartiguelongue
Modified: 2009-08-28 03:57 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.25/2.26



Description Gilles Dartiguelongue 2009-04-12 19:00:19 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Clicked rapidly on different folders.

I started evo and waited for it to sync, when I got back, I clicked rapidly on some folders of the same imap account and it crashed.


Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 2.0.0
Gnome Release: 2.26.0 2009-03-22 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.26.0

System: Linux 2.6.24-gentoo-r8-mactel #4 SMP Mon Feb 2 00:34:06 CET 2009 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10503000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Enabled
GTK+ Theme: Glossy
Icon Theme: gnome
GTK+ Modules: canberra-gtk-module, gail:atk-bridge, gnomebreakpad

Memory status: size: 775380992 vsize: 775380992 resident: 127377408 share: 26148864 rss: 127377408 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1239562308 rtime: 822 utime: 699 stime: 123 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0x2b0a05615f80 (LWP 7193)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a1ec65950 (LWP 10313)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a1ec24950 (LWP 10312)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a1aed3950 (LWP 10311)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a1a6d2950 (LWP 7799)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a18800950 (LWP 7798)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a19e3e950 (LWP 7791)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a19001950 (LWP 7786)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a11230950 (LWP 7774)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a13fac950 (LWP 7761)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a12c3f950 (LWP 7756)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a11a31950 (LWP 7723)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a10800950 (LWP 7695)]
[New Thread 0x2b0a0ffff950 (LWP 7688)]
0x00002b09f8d3b55f in __libc_waitpid (pid=10331, stat_loc=0x7fffb4df82f0, 
    options=0) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:41
	in ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c

Thread 1 (Thread 0x2b0a05615f80 (LWP 7193))

  • #0 __libc_waitpid
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c line 41
  • #1 IA__g_spawn_sync
    at gspawn.c line 382
  • #2 IA__g_spawn_command_line_sync
    at gspawn.c line 694
  • #3 bugbuddy_segv_handle
    at gnome-breakpad.cc line 369
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 e_flag_set
    at e-flag.c line 83
  • #6 emit_async_open_response
    at e-book.c line 2820
  • #7 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 1814
  • #8 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2448
  • #9 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2656
  • #10 bonobo_main
    at bonobo-main.c line 311
  • #11 main
    at main.c line 704


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
** Message: Signal 15 reçu, fin...
OK
12/04/2009 20:54:33 Autoprobing TCP port in (all) network interface
12/04/2009 20:54:33 Listening IPv{4,6}://*:5900
12/04/2009 20:54:33 Autoprobing selected port 5900
12/04/2009 20:54:33 Advertising security type: 'TLS' (18)
12/04/2009 20:54:33 Advertising authentication type: 'No Authentication' (1)
12/04/2009 20:54:33 Advertising security type: 'No Authentication' (1)
(gnome-terminal:7143): Gtk-CRITICAL **: gtk_paint_extension: assertion `style->depth == gdk_drawable_get_depth (window)' failed
41	../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c: No such file or directory.
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2009-04-13 06:04:39 UTC
looks dupe of bug 557613
Comment 2 Gilles Dartiguelongue 2009-04-13 09:24:19 UTC
it does look similar indeed.
Comment 3 palfrey 2009-06-24 11:28:17 UTC
*** Bug 586824 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-07-04 15:41:43 UTC
*** Bug 587727 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Akhil Laddha 2009-07-14 03:56:18 UTC
*** Bug 588420 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Ritesh Khadgaray ( irc:ritz) 2009-08-15 06:44:22 UTC
*** Bug 591877 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 Fabio Durán Verdugo 2009-08-15 15:30:13 UTC
*** Bug 591875 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 Akhil Laddha 2009-08-28 03:57:04 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 557613 ***