After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 569350 - Inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in pygtk.py
Inconsistent use of tabs and spaces in pygtk.py
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: pygobject
Classification: Bindings
Component: gobject
2.16.x
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Nobody's working on this now (help wanted and appreciated)
Python bindings maintainers
: 565083 571311 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2009-01-27 15:56 UTC by Sebastien Bacher
Modified: 2009-02-11 20:50 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.25/2.26


Description Sebastien Bacher 2009-01-27 15:56:33 UTC 
the bug has been opened on https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/305311

"I was trying to run a python application that uses pygtk.py, and it was crashing due to an inconsistent use of tabs and spaces. This occurred in three places. Searching through the document, I was able to change those lines so that they were only using spaces. This solved the problem, but I *stupidly* forgot to note which lines I changed; my apologies.

I am running Ubuntu Intrepid (8.10) and I have the package python-gobject 2.15.3-0ubuntu. Dpkg-query tells me that this is the package that owns pygtk.py. I hope you can quickly clean up the file, despite the lack of details. Let me know if this was an error on my side or if you need any more information."
Comment 1 Sebastien Bacher 2009-01-27 15:59:10 UTC 
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/20781371/pygtk.py.patch has a patch by Kevin Thompson

Comment from the bug and patch submitter on launchpad:

"I went through the file and found three places where there was a tab instead of the four spaces used throughout the rest of the file. I have changed the lines and created a patch file which is attached. I'm not sure who should actually review the patch and do something with it."
Comment 2 Gian Mario Tagliaretti 2009-01-28 00:04:47 UTC 
*** Bug 565083 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 Paul Pogonyshev 2009-01-29 19:43:33 UTC 
Committed a trivial fix in revision 1000.
Comment 4 Gian Mario Tagliaretti 2009-02-11 20:50:20 UTC 
*** Bug 571311 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***