After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 562461 - "Show compact contact list" has no obvious opposite
"Show compact contact list" has no obvious opposite
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 562468
Product: empathy
Classification: Core
Component: Preferences
2.24.x
Other Linux
: Normal minor
: ---
Assigned To: empathy-maint
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-11-27 14:47 UTC by Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt)
Modified: 2009-07-10 12:10 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.23/2.24



Description Matthew Paul Thomas (mpt) 2008-11-27 14:47:40 UTC
Empathy 2.24.1, Ubuntu 8.10

In the Preferences "General" tab, the "Appearance" section has a checkbox labelled "Show compact contact list".

Guideline: Use a checkbox only if the label for the checked state makes obvious the meaning of the unchecked state.

It's not obvious what it means for "Show compact contact list" to be unchecked. Does it mean not showing the contact list at all? Showing the contact list in a non-compact way? Or showing some other list instead of the contact list?

One way of solving this would be to present this option as a pair of radio buttons:
    Show contact list: (*) Normal size  ( ) Compact

Another way of solving it would be being more specific about what the option does:
    [/] Include buddy icons and statuses in the contact list
Comment 1 Wouter Bolsterlee (uws) 2009-01-06 13:21:41 UTC
The first suggestion is still awkward, I think. Something like this would make more sense imho:

  Contact list appearance:  [Normal Size _]   // 2-item combo box

Anyway, the second suggestion makes more sense, since it describes what actually happens.
Comment 2 Guillaume Desmottes 2009-07-10 12:10:20 UTC
This bug will be fixed with #562468. Marking it as a dup.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 562468 ***