GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 548017
crash in Document Viewer: scrolling a pdf document
Last modified: 2008-08-19 17:22:55 UTC
Version: 0.8.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? scrolling a pdf document Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 1.12.9 Gnome Release: 2.22.3 2008-08-14 (Gentoo) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-gentoo-r5 #6 Sun Oct 7 16:25:50 CEST 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Glossy Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 238858240 vsize: 238858240 resident: 56238080 share: 13864960 rss: 56238080 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1218705902 rtime: 836 utime: 808 stime: 28 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evince' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 47923953713744 (LWP 5243)] [New Thread 1082132800 (LWP 5244)] 0x00002b962702eaef in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 205228
Thread 1 (Thread 47923953713744 (LWP 5243))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- ** Message: volume = 0 ** Message: drive = 0 ** Message: volume = 0 No running windows found No running windows found Error: font resource is not a dictionary Error: font resource is not a dictionary Error: Unknown font tag 'TT4' Error: Unknown font tag 'TT6' warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libart_lgpl_2.so.2" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpng12.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libtiff.so.3" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 415714 ***