After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 540529 - Remove all GIMP references
Remove all GIMP references
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: gtk+
Classification: Platform
Component: .General
unspecified
Other All
: Normal trivial
: ---
Assigned To: gtk-bugs
gtk-bugs
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-06-27 19:08 UTC by Behdad Esfahbod
Modified: 2008-07-03 05:47 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Attachments
Change references (200.94 KB, patch)
2008-06-30 19:18 UTC, Cody Russell
none Details | Review
New patch for .pc files (2.40 KB, patch)
2008-07-01 23:03 UTC, Cody Russell
committed Details | Review

Description Behdad Esfahbod 2008-06-27 19:08:16 UTC
The GTK+ pkg-config files still say "GIMP Tool Kit" in their Description.  About time to call GTK+ "The GTK+ Toolkit" or something...
Comment 1 Dan Winship 2008-06-27 21:50:20 UTC
Or "GNOME Toolkit"

Comment 2 Matthias Clasen 2008-06-30 16:29:21 UTC
I'm for "GTK+ toolkit". Please go ahead and make that change. It might be worthwhile also grepping over the docs to see if there are more places
Comment 3 Cody Russell 2008-06-30 19:18:16 UTC
Created attachment 113729 [details] [review]
Change references

Is this okay to commit?
Comment 4 Matthias Clasen 2008-06-30 21:55:29 UTC
I had no idea this would touch every thing source file...

Maybe there should be a section in the docs somewhere explaining the genesis of the name. 

Other than that, it looks ok to me.

Comment 5 Michael Natterer 2008-06-30 22:57:05 UTC
Clear NO from here if I have a voice. What's the purpose of that?
This is essentially changing the name of the toolkit, the project,
the product.
Comment 6 Cody Russell 2008-06-30 23:04:01 UTC
Made a small note about it in the faq, but maybe someone can write something better.
Comment 7 Cody Russell 2008-06-30 23:05:29 UTC
im in ur gtk, pwning ur gimps
Comment 8 Michael Natterer 2008-06-30 23:12:30 UTC
This can't be done without discussion. Reopening. See my earlier comment.
Comment 9 Cody Russell 2008-06-30 23:14:00 UTC
Sorry mitch, I actually committed before I saw your comment.
Comment 10 Johan (not receiving bugmail) Dahlin 2008-06-30 23:14:37 UTC
For what it's worth I like the name "Gtk ToolKit" slightly better than "Gimp ToolKit", but it's not a big deal. Recursive names are cute.

Comment 11 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-06-30 23:17:03 UTC
It's about not expanding the acronym, not changing the project name.  We did the same to GNOME and GUADEC.  You don't write "GNU Network Object...what was the rest??" in your project files.  Same applies here.
Comment 12 Michael Natterer 2008-06-30 23:23:14 UTC
Since the string "GIMP Toolkit" doesn't really show up any more when
I grep for it, I don't quite buy this reasoning.
Comment 13 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-06-30 23:26:43 UTC
Buy it or not, this bug is real: "GIMP Tool Kit" has no place in GTK+'s pkg-config file.  I don't care about source file headers.
Comment 14 Christian Dywan 2008-07-01 07:28:51 UTC
Curiously, why was this committed before today's meeting?
Comment 15 Michael Natterer 2008-07-01 10:42:46 UTC
Behdad, i don't really care about the pkg-config file.

What I do care about is that this patch is reverted without
discussion, just as it was applied without discussion.

First commiting such a change and *then* having the discussion
is like hanging first, trial later.

Not like that please!
Comment 16 Matthias Clasen 2008-07-01 11:54:07 UTC
We'll discuss it at todays meeting anyway, I guess.
Comment 17 Michael Natterer 2008-07-01 14:05:28 UTC
Unfortunately I probably can't attend the meeting tonight, but I hope
that my absence doesn't prevent this patch from being reverted,
apart from pkg-config and maybe some other places...
Comment 18 Cody Russell 2008-07-01 16:46:30 UTC
I'll be happy to revert the whole thing and just apply it to the pkg-config files and stuff.  I'm just waiting until after the discussion before doing anything, because I don't want to revert the entire thing and then be told I need to re-apply the whole thing or something. :)
Comment 19 Behdad Esfahbod 2008-07-01 18:27:34 UTC
Well, Mitch, it was discussed in this bug.  No one thought it's such a big deal needing discussion with the entire team...
Comment 20 Cody Russell 2008-07-01 20:23:37 UTC
GTK+ meeting today, the decision is that I will revert the entire patch and only change the .pc files.  Docs and .[ch] files will go back to the way they were.  I'll do this later tonight after work.

In the .pc files it will say "GTK+ Graphical UI library"
Comment 21 Cody Russell 2008-07-01 23:03:06 UTC
Created attachment 113821 [details] [review]
New patch for .pc files

The previous patch is reverted.  Let me know if this one is okay to commit.
Comment 22 Matthias Clasen 2008-07-03 04:52:47 UTC
Yes, please commit
Comment 23 Cody Russell 2008-07-03 05:47:36 UTC
2008-07-03  Cody Russell  <bratsche@gnome.org>

        Bug 540529 – Remove all GIMP references

        * gtk+-2.0.pc.in:
        * gdk-2.0.pc.in:
        * gtk+-unix-print-2.0.pc.in:
        * gtk+-2.0-uninstalled.pc.in:
        * gdk-2.0-uninstalled.pc.in: Changed GIMP Toolkit to say
        GTK+ Graphical UI Library in the pkg-config files.