GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 539841
crash in Open Folder: double clicked to open a...
Last modified: 2008-06-24 07:12:42 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? double clicked to open a subfolder on share on a windows 2003 server Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.2 2008-05-29 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.24-1-amd64 #1 SMP Thu May 8 03:30:20 UTC 2008 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400090 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 278249472 vsize: 278249472 resident: 209768448 share: 17055744 rss: 209768448 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1213065059 rtime: 108000 utime: 56527 stime: 51473 cutime:4237 cstime: 865 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xf6b92720 (LWP 4986)] [New Thread 0xf1c38b90 (LWP 30094)] 0xf72dcf91 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 201200
Thread 1 (Thread 0xf6b92720 (LWP 4986))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- warning: .dynamic section for "/lib/libacl.so.1" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libfam.so.0" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libplds4.so.0d" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libplc4.so.0d" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libnspr4.so.0d" is not at the expected address (wrong library or version mismatch?) warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libtiff.so.4" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: Lowest section in system-supplied DSO at 0xffffe000 is .hash at ffffe0b4 --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522534 ***