GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 530940
crash in File Browser:
Last modified: 2008-05-02 23:26:56 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.1 2008-04-08 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.24-1-powerpc #1 Fri Apr 18 19:53:00 CEST 2008 ppc X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: gartoon Memory status: size: 75710464 vsize: 75710464 resident: 26923008 share: 20168704 rss: 26923008 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1209673752 rtime: 1007 utime: 956 stime: 51 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0x4804a100 (LWP 10207)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0f158290 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 196623
Thread 1 (Thread 0x4804a100 (LWP 10207))
----------- .xsession-errors (7 sec old) --------------------- ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed ** (nautilus:10207): CRITICAL **: file_get_share_status_file: assertion `path != NULL' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 522534 ***