GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 529491
crash in File Browser: I was closing the window...
Last modified: 2008-04-23 09:39:39 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? I was closing the windows of the navegator. Distribution: Debian lenny/sid Gnome Release: 2.22.1 2008-04-08 (Debian) BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0 System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686 #1 SMP Sat Apr 19 00:37:55 UTC 2008 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400090 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Industrial Icon Theme: SphereCrystal Memory status: size: 104775680 vsize: 104775680 resident: 34373632 share: 17920000 rss: 34373632 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1208908953 rtime: 4716 utime: 4447 stime: 269 cutime:37 cstime: 7 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6b67720 (LWP 3037)] [New Thread 0xb4e9fb90 (LWP 8173)] (no debugging symbols found) 0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 195906
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6b67720 (LWP 3037))
----------- .xsession-errors (7 sec old) --------------------- QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver QApplication::postEvent: Unexpected null receiver ** ERROR **: file fm-tree-model.c: line 1527 (fm_tree_model_unref_node): assertion failed: (parent->dummy_child_ref_count > 0) aborting... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 510468 ***