After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 525619 - crash in Evolution: Opening evolution. I bel...
crash in Evolution: Opening evolution. I bel...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 512605
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
2.12.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2008-04-01 19:05 UTC by rob.dawson
Modified: 2008-04-03 14:06 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.21/2.22



Description rob.dawson 2008-04-01 19:05:58 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Opening evolution. I believe it was attempting to filter emails. This suggests that this may be identical to id 512605


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.22.0 2008-03-14 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.22.0

System: Linux 2.6.24-1-686-bigmem #1 SMP Mon Feb 11 15:21:55 UTC 2008 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Simple
Icon Theme: gnome

Memory status: size: 61472768 vsize: 61472768 resident: 22355968 share: 9383936 rss: 22355968 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1207074460 rtime: 458 utime: 328 stime: 130 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/lib/bug-buddy/evolution-exchange-storage'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6657740 (LWP 5199)]
[New Thread 0xb647eb90 (LWP 5201)]
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6657740 (LWP 5199))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #7 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #8 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #9 __assert_fail
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #10 ber_flush2
    at /tmp/buildd/openldap2.3-2.4.7/libraries/liblber/io.c line 234
  • #11 ldap_int_flush_request
    at request.c line 152
  • #12 ldap_send_server_request
    at request.c line 348
  • #13 ldap_send_initial_request
    at request.c line 136
  • #14 ldap_ntlm_bind
    at ntlm.c line 73
  • #15 connect_ldap
    at e2k-global-catalog.c line 243
  • #16 gc_search
  • #17 e2k_global_catalog_lookup
    at e2k-global-catalog.c line 796
  • #18 get_message
    at mail-stub-exchange.c line 2266
  • #19 connection_handler
    at mail-stub.c line 271
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
(gnome-panel:3514): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type _OB_WM_ACTION_UNDECORATE
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2008-04-03 14:06:06 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into
our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you
find.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 512605 ***