Please describe the problem:
When an interface definition is given inside a subroutine this is done because of either the possibility to have argument checking or the language requires it. One does not expect to see this interface back as a data type:

Example:
      SUBROUTINE tst
      INTERFACE
        SUBROUTINE tst1
        END SUBROUTINE tst1
      END INTERFACE
      RETURN
      END


result in documentation:

Data Types
interface  	tst__interface



Steps to reproduce:
1. See description above


Actual results:
See description above

Expected results:
Don't see the data type

Does this happen every time?
Yes

Other information: