Bug 518327 – crash in Volume Control: Had just adjusted the vo...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 518327 - crash in Volume Control: Had just adjusted the vo...


Summary:	crash in Volume Control: Had just adjusted the vo...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 471133

Product:	gnome-media
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	gnome-volume-control
Version:	2.18.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	gnome media maintainers
QA Contact:	gnome media maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2008-02-23 23:19 UTC by sabayon
Modified:	2008-02-28 13:08 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description sabayon 2008-02-23 23:19:29 UTC

Version: 2.18.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Had just adjusted the volume, looked at the preferenced and the last thing was closing the window with the X in the upper right corner.


Distribution: Gentoo Base System release 1.12.10
Gnome Release: 2.18.1 2007-05-04 (Gentoo)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1

System: Linux 2.6.22-sabayon #1 SMP Mon Sep 3 00:33:06 UTC 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70000000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Human-Graphite
Icon Theme: Tango

Memory status: size: 185393152 vsize: 185393152 resident: 17752064 share: 12742656 rss: 17752064 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1203808653 rtime: 220 utime: 205 stime: 15 cutime:3 cstime: 1 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-volume-control'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b6f0e08ead5 in waitpid () from /lib/libpthread.so.0

+ Trace 190240

#0 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#1 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#4 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 gtk_widget_unparent
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#9 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 g_object_unref
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 g_object_unref
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 g_value_unset
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 gnome_volume_control_element_change
#39 ??
#40 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#41 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#43 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#44 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#45 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#46 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#47 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#48 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#49 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#50 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#51 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#52 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#53 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#54 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#55 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#57 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#58 ??
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#59 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#60 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#61 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#62 g_object_run_dispose
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#63 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#64 ??
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#65 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#66 ??
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#67 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#68 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#69 main



----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(emerald:9559): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(emerald:9559): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(gnome-volume-control:10029): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `object->ref_count > 0' failed
X Error: BadWindow (invalid Window parameter) 3
  Major opcode:  19
  Minor opcode:  0
  Resource id:  0x3600003
(emerald:9559): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(emerald:9559): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
No running windows found
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Gianluca Borello 2008-02-28 13:08:19 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 471133 ***