GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 514747
crash in Open Folder:
Last modified: 2008-02-07 09:21:35 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 104992768 vsize: 104992768 resident: 49844224 share: 21880832 rss: 49844224 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1202221003 rtime: 2011 utime: 1498 stime: 513 cutime:1 cstime: 10 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208613152 (LWP 3494)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 188284
Thread 1 (Thread -1208613152 (LWP 3494))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgnome-window-settings.so.1" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpanel-applet-2.so.0" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libmetacity-private.so.0" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libpoppler-glib.so.1" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436071 ***