After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 51010 - Script-Fu/Frosty -- output of early gimp-1.1.x versions looked better
Script-Fu/Frosty -- output of early gimp-1.1.x versions looked better
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 15084
Product: GIMP
Classification: Other
Component: Script-Fu
1.x
Other Linux
: Normal enhancement
: ---
Assigned To: Daniel Egger
Daniel Egger
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2001-02-18 00:47 UTC by peter.bergt
Modified: 2001-02-19 08:31 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description peter.bergt 2001-02-18 00:47:34 UTC 
Today I've tried to made a frosty logo using gimp-1.2.1, comparing the new
logos to older ones (made with gimp-1.1.x about a year ago ) I realized
that the standard settings of script-fu create a really boring output.

I've uploaded a logo made with gimp-1.2.1 and an older logo wich was
created about a year ago with a gimp-1.1.x version at
http://www.hehe.at/gimp/ to see the difference

because it's not easy to describe it with words so I decided to upload the
2 logos :), and as I don't know how to manipulate the script in the right
way I bother you ... sorry ;)
Comment 1 Raphaël Quinet 2001-02-19 08:31:21 UTC 
Thanks for the bug report, but that has already been mentioned in
bug #15084.  During the development of Gimp 1.1.x, the Sparkle
plug-in was modified, and unfortunately it does not produce the same
results as before.  The Sparkle plug-in seems to have other problems
with selections, so hopefully this will be fixed someday...


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 15084 ***