After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 506141 - crash in CD/DVD Creator: Try to view properties o...
crash in CD/DVD Creator: Try to view properties o...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 440988
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-28 20:53 UTC by nemia
Modified: 2007-12-29 11:19 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.19/2.20



Description nemia 2007-12-28 20:53:20 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Try to view properties on .odt file


Distribution: Debian lenny/sid
Gnome Release: 2.20.2 2007-11-29 (Debian)
BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1

System: Linux 2.6.23.9 #1 SMP Mon Dec 3 20:31:37 EET 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: SphereCrystal
Icon Theme: SphereCrystal

Memory status: size: 75440128 vsize: 75440128 resident: 28889088 share: 15720448 rss: 28889088 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1198874918 rtime: 375 utime: 357 stime: 18 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 0xb6df86b0 (LWP 6084)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6df86b0 (LWP 6084))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 g_spawn_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #3 g_spawn_command_line_sync
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/modules/libgnomebreakpad.so
  • #5 <signal handler called>
  • #6 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #7 raise
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #8 abort
    from /lib/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
  • #9 g_logv
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_log
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 g_assert_warning
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #12 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??
  • #24 ??
  • #25 ??
  • #26 ??
  • #27 ??
  • #28 ??
  • #29 ??
  • #30 ??
  • #31 ??
  • #32 ??
  • #33 ??
  • #34 ??
  • #35 ??
  • #36 ??
  • #37 ??
  • #38 ??
  • #39 ??
  • #40 ??
  • #41 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #42 ??
  • #43 ??
  • #44 ??
  • #45 ??
  • #46 ??
  • #47 ??
  • #48 ??
  • #49 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 ??
  • #51 ??
  • #52 ??
  • #53 ??
  • #54 ??
  • #55 ??
  • #56 g_sequence_sort_changed_iter
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors ---------------------
(gnome-panel:5350): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(gnome-panel:5350): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(gnome-panel:5350): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(gnome-panel:5350): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
Gtk-ERROR **: file /tmp/buildd/gtk+2.0-2.12.1/gtk/gtkliststore.c: line 1677 (gtk_list_store_compare_func): assertion failed: (VALID_ITER (&iter_b, list_store))
aborting...
(gnome-panel:5350): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
(gnome-panel:5350): Wnck-WARNING **: Unhandled action type (nil)
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-12-29 11:19:24 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 440988 ***