GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 503964
crash in Panel: using gnome-terminal, an...
Last modified: 2008-01-08 19:16:42 UTC
Version: 2.18.3 What were you doing when the application crashed? using gnome-terminal, and the whole X session just gave up the ghost. Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.23.8-34.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Nov 22 20:39:56 EST 2007 x86_64 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Bluecurve Icon Theme: Bluecurve Memory status: size: 322015232 vsize: 322015232 resident: 31854592 share: 28258304 rss: 31854592 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615 CPU usage: start_time: 1197856821 rtime: 8 utime: 6 stime: 2 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-panel' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 46912496376688 (LWP 11676)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x000000311b00d945 in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
+ Trace 182078
Thread 1 (Thread 46912496376688 (LWP 11676))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- \ ^__^ \ (oo)\_______ (__)\ )\/\ ||----w | || || SESSION_MANAGER=local/unix:/tmp/.ICE-unix/11547 Initializing nautilus-open-terminal extension (gnome-panel:11676): GConf-WARNING **: Directory `/apps/panel/toplevels/bottom_panel_screen1/screen' was not being monitored by GConfClient 0x6c35e0 (gnome-panel:11676): GConf-WARNING **: Directory `/apps/panel/toplevels/top_panel_screen1/screen' was not being monitored by GConfClient 0x6c35e0 (gnome-panel:11676): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed warning: no loadable sections found in added symbol-file system-supplied DSO at 0x7fff163fd000 --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 446183 ***