After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 501888 - crash in Tasks: Changing account info
crash in Tasks: Changing account info
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 480210
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-12-05 20:44 UTC by wade.blackwell
Modified: 2007-12-06 01:11 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description wade.blackwell 2007-12-05 20:44:39 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Changing account info


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-11-13 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-2943.fc7xen #1 SMP Tue Oct 23 14:58:12 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 937013248 vsize: 937013248 resident: 316174336 share: 41353216 rss: 316174336 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1196883487 rtime: 35753 utime: 33990 stime: 1763 cutime:0 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496382096 (LWP 449)]
[New Thread 1168415056 (LWP 1638)]
[New Thread 1105209680 (LWP 575)]
[New Thread 1147435344 (LWP 497)]
[New Thread 1147169104 (LWP 473)]
[New Thread 1126189392 (LWP 470)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x0000003a8640d97f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496382096 (LWP 449))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_slice_free1
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_node_traverse
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_tree_store_remove
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 em_folder_tree_model_remove_folders
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #13 em_folder_tree_model_remove_folders
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #14 em_folder_tree_model_remove_folders
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #15 em_folder_tree_model_remove_folders
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #16 em_folder_tree_model_remove_store
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #18 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #23 e_config_commit
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/libeutil.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/libeutil.so.0
  • #25 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #29 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #31 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #32 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #33 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #34 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #35 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #36 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #37 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #38 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #39 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #40 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 g_signal_emit
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #45 gtk_propagate_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #46 gtk_main_do_event
    from /usr/lib64/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #47 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #48 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #49 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #50 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #51 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib64/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #52 main
  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0


----------- .xsession-errors (53 sec old) ---------------------
(evolution:449): gtkhtml-WARNING **: No such file or directory
connection_message_func(): Callback
CALLBACK: fill-authentication!!!
connection_message_func(): Callback
CALLBACK: fill-authentication!!!
[20:25:38] Writing local files
[20:25:38] Completed 7000 out of 100000 steps  (7%)
[20:42:13] Writing local files
[20:42:13] Completed 8000 out of 100000 steps  (8%)
(evolution:449): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib64/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
(evolution:449): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x553c900'
(evolution:449): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x553d300'
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2007-12-06 01:11:05 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 480210 ***