GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 498361
crash in Tasks: changing smtp address
Last modified: 2007-11-20 19:30:27 UTC
Version: 2.10 What were you doing when the application crashed? changing smtp address Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine) Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0 System: Linux 2.6.22.9-91.fc7 #1 SMP Thu Sep 27 23:10:59 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: Permissive Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Icon Theme: Fedora Memory status: size: 141893632 vsize: 141893632 resident: 58888192 share: 37773312 rss: 58888192 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1195517083 rtime: 2838 utime: 2651 stime: 187 cutime:43 cstime: 18 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208686880 (LWP 10408)] [New Thread -1266644080 (LWP 10516)] [New Thread -1256154224 (LWP 10436)] [New Thread -1222280304 (LWP 10425)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x00110402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 178835
Thread 1 (Thread -1208686880 (LWP 10408))
----------- .xsession-errors (2932061 sec old) --------------------- (gnome-background-properties:15590): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:15590): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:15590): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:15590): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_width: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:15590): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_get_height: assertion `pixbuf != NULL' failed (gnome-background-properties:15590): GdkPixbuf-CRITICAL **: gdk_pixbuf_composite: assertion `src != NULL' failed (gnome-background-propert ...Too much output, ignoring rest... --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436128 ***