GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 496435
crash in Computer:
Last modified: 2007-11-13 21:56:49 UTC
Version: 2.20.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Unknown Gnome Release: 2.20.1 2007-11-09 (JHBuild) BugBuddy Version: 2.20.1 System: Linux 2.6.23.1-mactel #1 SMP Fri Nov 9 19:12:52 CET 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10400000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks Compact Icon Theme: gnome Memory status: size: 332382208 vsize: 332382208 resident: 280338432 share: 16064512 rss: 280338432 rss_rlim: 4294967295 CPU usage: start_time: 1194955073 rtime: 40135 utime: 34356 stime: 5779 cutime:0 cstime: 22 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/local/bin/nautilus' Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread 0xb6cca6c0 (LWP 19955)] 0xb7f4a410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 177411
Thread 1 (Thread 0xb6cca6c0 (LWP 19955))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_ref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed (nautilus:19955): GLib-GObject-CRITICAL **: g_object_unref: assertion `G_IS_OBJECT (object)' failed --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 483884 ***