After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 486822 - www.gnome.org is not valid HTML 4.01
www.gnome.org is not valid HTML 4.01
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: website
Classification: Infrastructure
Component: www.gnome.org
current
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Web maintainers
GNOME Web maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-10-15 13:10 UTC by Lucas Lommer
Modified: 2007-11-28 15:39 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Lucas Lommer 2007-10-15 13:10:37 UTC
http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.gnome.org%2F

Line 2, Column 12: there is no attribute "XMLNS".
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">

Line 10, Column 63: character data is not allowed here.
…l="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="/frontpage.css" />
Comment 1 Lloyd D Budd 2007-10-31 20:30:25 UTC
Confirmed bug is still present.

The title should probably end "...HTML 4.01 Strict"

Timely resolution seems appropriate considering the footer reads: "Optimised for standards. Hosted by Red Hat."
Comment 2 Diego Escalante Urrelo (not reading bugmail) 2007-11-01 02:56:49 UTC
If we keep the xmlns thing in <html> then the doctype should be changed and some / added to some tags. I have no idea what's the expected type of that document, if anyone can clarify that it's easily fixable.
Comment 3 Thomas Thurman 2007-11-01 03:15:45 UTC
[collision with comment #2]

No; the title shouldn't end HTML 4.01 Strict. There is no trivial fix. "xmlns" is an XML thing, and so can't appear in *any* version of HTML 4 as such, because no version of HTML 4 is XML. Rather, we must decide either that the whole thing is HTML 4.01 or that the whole thing is some form of XHTML.

The breakage appears to have been introduced in r5322, which was checked in by rzhou; I'm ccing him to ask what he thinks we should do.

http://svn.gnome.org/viewvc/gnomeweb-wml/trunk/www.gnome.org/index.wml?view=diff&r1=5321&r2=5322
Comment 4 Ricky Zhou 2007-11-28 15:39:17 UTC
Sorry this took so long - this should be fixed in r5678.