GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 484862
crash in Deskbar:
Last modified: 2007-10-09 09:52:45 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Distribution: Ubuntu 7.10 (gutsy) Gnome Release: 2.20.0 2007-09-17 (Ubuntu) BugBuddy Version: 2.18.1 System: Linux 2.6.22-13-generic #1 SMP Thu Oct 4 17:18:44 GMT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 10300000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Enabled GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks-Quicksilver Icon Theme: OSX Memory status: size: 0 vsize: 0 resident: 0 share: 0 rss: 0 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 0 rtime: 0 utime: 0 stime: 0 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 ----------- .xsession-errors (129 sec old) --------------------- HTTP download thread ended Shutting down aMule... aMule dialog destroyed Now, exiting main app... aMule OnExit: Terminating core. Saving PartFile 1 of 20 Saving PartFile 2 of 20 Saving PartFile 3 of 20 Saving PartFile 4 of 20 Saving PartFile 5 of 20 Saving PartFile 6 of 20 Saving PartFile 7 of 20 Saving PartFile 8 of 20 Saving All PartFiles Saved. aMule shutdown completed. QWidget::setMinimumSize: The smallest allowed size is (0,0) QComboBox::setCurrentItem: (speakerComboBox) Index 1 out of range Advertencia del gestor de ventanas: Buggy client sent a _NET_ACTIVE_WINDOW message with a timestamp of 0 for 0x3400017 (tilda) Advertencia del gestor de ventanas: meta_window_activate called by a pager with a 0 timestamp; the pager needs to be fixed. /home/unf/.themes/Clearlooks-Quicksilver/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:54: Clearlooks configuration option "menuitemstyle" is not supported and will be ignored. /home/unf/.themes/Clearlooks-Quicksilver/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:55: Clearlooks configuration option "listviewitemstyle" is not supported and will be ignored. /home/unf/.themes/Clearlooks-Quicksilver/gtk-2.0/gtkrc:56: Clearlooks configuration option "progressbarstyle" is not supported and will be ignored. -------------------------------------------------- Traceback (most recent call last):
+ Trace 168879
cell.set_property ("has-more-actions", len(match.get_actions()) > 1)
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers? *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 471672 ***