Bug 480885 – crash in Eye of Gnome: viewing svg file from Ec...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 480885 - crash in Eye of Gnome: viewing svg file from Ec...


Summary:	crash in Eye of Gnome: viewing svg file from Ec...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357939

Product:	eog
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	EOG Maintainers
QA Contact:	EOG Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-27 10:06 UTC by martinb
Modified:	2007-09-28 09:17 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description martinb 2007-09-27 10:06:12 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
viewing svg fime from Eclipse


Distribution: openSUSE 10.2 (X86-64)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-11-28 (SUSE)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 250175488 vsize: 250175488 resident: 5586944 share: 13414400 rss: 19001344 rss_rlim: 445557760
CPU usage: start_time: 1190889807 rtime: 62 utime: 54 stime: 8 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/opt/gnome/bin/eog'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47395460817952 (LWP 5529)]
[New Thread 1090525504 (LWP 5531)]
[New Thread 1082132800 (LWP 5530)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b1b1ad9c1f6 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6

+ Trace 165860

Thread 2 (Thread 1090525504 (LWP 5531))

#0 waitpid
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#2 <signal handler called>
#3 raise
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#4 abort
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#5 __assert_fail
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#6 cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
from /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2
#7 cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib64/libcairo.so.2
#8 script_engine_init
from /opt/gnome/lib64/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
#9 pango_shape
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#10 pango_layout_set_width
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#11 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#12 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#13 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 pango_layout_get_pixel_extents
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#15 pango_layout_get_pixel_size
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libpango-1.0.so.0
#16 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#17 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#18 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#19 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#20 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#21 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#22 rsvg_handle_render_cairo_sub
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#23 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_sub
from /opt/gnome/lib64/librsvg-2.so.2
#24 fill_info
from /opt/gnome/lib64/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#25 gdk_pixbuf_loader_close
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0
#26 gnome_gdk_pixbuf_new_from_uri_at_scale
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#27 gnome_thumbnail_factory_generate_thumbnail
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#28 eog_thumbnail_load
#29 eog_collection_item_new
#30 eog_job_call_action
#31 eog_job_manager_add
#32 g_thread_create_full
from /opt/gnome/lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 start_thread
from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
#34 clone
from /lib64/libc.so.6
#35 ??

Comment 1 Cosimo Cecchi 2007-09-28 09:17:03 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357939 ***