After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 480320 - crash in Tasks: triny to send and reciev...
crash in Tasks: triny to send and reciev...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 447591
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: BugBuddyBugs
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Triage Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-09-25 17:46 UTC by abashorun
Modified: 2008-05-02 10:33 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description abashorun 2007-09-25 17:46:53 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
triny to send and recieve


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:11:19 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Water Vapor
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 166912000 vsize: 166912000 resident: 35823616 share: 21712896 rss: 35823616 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1190741851 rtime: 3315 utime: 2997 stime: 318 cutime:1 cstime: 5 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209063712 (LWP 12823)]
[New Thread -1278223472 (LWP 21923)]
[New Thread -1341903984 (LWP 21458)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00dc9402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1209063712 (LWP 12823))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free_1
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 g_slist_remove
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0

Comment 1 Akhil Laddha 2008-05-02 10:33:47 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but
we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be
solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software
upgrade.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 447591 ***