After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 476860 - Changing size of sizebar is not behaving as expected.
Changing size of sizebar is not behaving as expected.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 449462
Product: evince
Classification: Core
Component: general
0.8.x
Other All
: Normal major
: ---
Assigned To: Evince Maintainers
Evince Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-09-14 10:27 UTC by Matti Katila
Modified: 2007-09-14 11:20 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---



Description Matti Katila 2007-09-14 10:27:42 UTC
Please describe the problem:
The sidebar view is shared with table of contents and thumbnail view. The minium size of the sidebar is counted with thumbnail page view. Now, when sidebar size is changed the minium width is maximum of n pages in a row in the thumbnail view. If user changes the sidebar to maximum, i.e. right side of the window, the pages in thumbnail view are rearranged. Thus, sidebar can not be changed to minimum anymore since minimum width is maximum pages in a row of thumbnail view.

Steps to reproduce:
1. open document with more than ten pages.
2. open sidebar
3. set table of contents view into sidebar
4. change sidebar size to maximum
5. change sidebar size to minimum <- not possible.


Actual results:
The sidebar size does not change from maximum to minimum.

Expected results:
the step 5. should be possible

Does this happen every time?
yes

Other information:
The bad thing in this bug is that when the user exits the program the sidebar size is stored into gconf, i.e. if user tries to reopen the same document he/she can not use sidebar anymore.
Comment 1 Carlos Garcia Campos 2007-09-14 11:20:22 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 449462 ***