Bug 475106 – crash in Email:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 475106 - crash in Email:


Summary:	crash in Email:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 426227

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	Mailer
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	evolution-mail-maintainers
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-09-09 13:03 UTC by davide
Modified:	2007-09-21 18:51 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.17/2.18

Description davide 2007-09-09 13:03:02 UTC

Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 141385728 vsize: 141385728 resident: 53288960 share: 37146624 rss: 53288960 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1189436082 rtime: 727 utime: 672 stime: 55 cutime:2 cstime: 6 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1209084192 (LWP 3388)]
[New Thread -1252013168 (LWP 3524)]
[New Thread -1287148656 (LWP 3522)]
[New Thread -1330492528 (LWP 3447)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00eb3402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 161515

Thread 1 (Thread -1209084192 (LWP 3388))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/libpthread.so.0
#2 ??
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 ??
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#6 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#7 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#8 g_slice_free1
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#10 g_slist_foreach
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#11 pango_layout_line_unref
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#12 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#13 ??
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 g_object_unref
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#15 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 gtk_widget_unparent
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#35 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#36 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#37 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#38 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#39 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#40 gtk_container_remove
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#41 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#42 g_object_run_dispose
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#43 gtk_object_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#44 gtk_widget_destroy
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#45 ??
from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/libeutil.so.0
#46 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#47 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#48 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#49 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#50 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#51 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#52 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#53 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#54 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#55 g_closure_invoke
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#56 ??
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#57 g_signal_emit_valist
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#58 g_signal_emit
from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#59 ??
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#60 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#61 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#62 ??
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#63 g_main_context_dispatch
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#64 ??
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#65 g_main_loop_run
from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#66 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#67 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall



----------- .xsession-errors (70 sec old) ---------------------
(evolution:3388): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
BBDB spinning up...
(evolution:3388): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x8835018'
(evolution:3388): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x8835138'
(evolution:3388): e-data-server-DEBUG: Loading categories from "/root/.evolution/categories.xml"
(evolution:3388): e-data-server-DEBUG: Loaded 29 categories
(evolution:3388): e-utils-WARNING **: Cannot resolve symbol 'org_gnome_new_mail_config' in plugin '/usr/lib/evolution/2.10/plugins/liborg-gnome-new-mail-notify.so' (not exported?)
(evolution:3388): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x8835378'
(evolution:3388): GLib-GObject-WARNING **: gsignal.c:1669: signal `source_selected' is invalid for instance `0x8835498'
--------------------------------------------------

Comment 1 Suman Manjunath 2007-09-09 16:06:21 UTC

Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 426227 ***