After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 468712 - crash in Rhythmbox Music Player: dlb clicked on song
crash in Rhythmbox Music Player: dlb clicked on song
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 436456
Product: rhythmbox
Classification: Other
Component: general
0.10.0
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: RhythmBox Maintainers
RhythmBox Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-21 02:09 UTC by AndyHowell
Modified: 2007-08-21 12:37 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description AndyHowell 2007-08-21 02:09:23 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
dlb clicked on song



Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:47:07 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 741130240 vsize: 741130240 resident: 43069440 share: 21364736 rss: 43069440 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1187661118 rtime: 886 utime: 794 stime: 92 cutime:2 cstime: 4 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/rhythmbox'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912534553040 (LWP 3356)]
[New Thread 1147169104 (LWP 3951)]
[New Thread 1136679248 (LWP 3950)]
[New Thread 1126189392 (LWP 3948)]
[New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 3947)]
[New Thread 1105209680 (LWP 3945)]
[New Thread 1094719824 (LWP 3944)]
[New Thread 1388435792 (LWP 3941)]
[New Thread 1409415504 (LWP 3939)]
[New Thread 1084229968 (LWP 3363)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002aaaac3f92e6 in poll () from /lib64/libc.so.6

Thread 2 (Thread 1147169104 (LWP 3951))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 raise
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #4 abort
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #5 __assert_fail
    from /lib64/libc.so.6
  • #6 PyEval_EvalFrameEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #7 PyEval_EvalCodeEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #8 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #9 PyObject_Call
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #11 PyObject_CallFunction
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #12 PyErr_WarnEx
    from /usr/lib64/libpython2.5.so.1.0
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib64/python2.5/site-packages/gtk-2.0/gobject/_gobject.so
  • #14 g_logv
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #15 g_log
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_type_check_instance_cast
    from /lib64/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gstreamer-0.10/libgstgnomevfs.so
  • #18 gnome_vfs_module_callback_invoke
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
  • #21 ne_begin_request
    from /usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
  • #24 ??
    from /usr/lib64/gnome-vfs-2.0/modules/libhttp.so
  • #25 gnome_vfs_open_uri_cancellable
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #28 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libgnomevfs-2.so.0
  • #29 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #30 ??
    from /lib64/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #31 start_thread
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #32 clone
    from /lib64/libc.so.6

Comment 1 Jonathan Matthew 2007-08-21 12:37:21 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 436456 ***