After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 465692 - crash in Tasks: Closing evolution.
crash in Tasks: Closing evolution.
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 445309
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 467578 469089 471691 472885 474200 495032 497023 501244 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-11 15:05 UTC by mrw
Modified: 2007-12-03 16:13 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description mrw 2007-08-11 15:05:07 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Closing evolution.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.3 2007-07-02 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.22.1-41.fc7 #1 SMP Fri Jul 27 18:21:43 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70200000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 608550912 vsize: 608550912 resident: 61177856 share: 28184576 rss: 61177856 rss_rlim: 18446744073709551615
CPU usage: start_time: 1186844439 rtime: 429 utime: 358 stime: 71 cutime:357 cstime: 51 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496521360 (LWP 9643)]
[New Thread 1147169104 (LWP 10241)]
[New Thread 1115965776 (LWP 9737)]
[New Thread 1115699536 (LWP 9736)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x000000346760d97f in waitpid () from /lib64/libpthread.so.0

Thread 2 (Thread 1147169104 (LWP 10241))

  • #0 __lll_mutex_lock_wait
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 _L_mutex_lock_103
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 pthread_mutex_lock
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 pthread_mutex_lock
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #5 PR_Lock
    from /usr/lib64/libnspr4.so
  • #6 ??
    from /usr/lib64/libnspr4.so
  • #7 __nptl_deallocate_tsd
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #8 start_thread
    from /lib64/libpthread.so.0
  • #9 clone
    from /lib64/libc.so.6


----------- .xsession-errors (30 sec old) ---------------------
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
(evolution:9643): camel-WARNING **: camel_exception_get_id called with NULL parameter.
report junk?? R:O:L:E:X now on SALE , C:A:R:T:I:E:R , Breitling SAVE!! i
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-08-17 11:06:47 UTC
*** Bug 467578 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 palfrey 2007-08-22 13:22:10 UTC
*** Bug 469089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 3 André Klapper 2007-08-22 18:06:59 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 445309 ***
Comment 4 palfrey 2007-08-30 16:35:42 UTC
*** Bug 471691 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 palfrey 2007-09-03 16:49:26 UTC
*** Bug 472885 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 palfrey 2007-09-06 12:09:33 UTC
*** Bug 474200 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 7 palfrey 2007-11-08 18:12:41 UTC
*** Bug 495032 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 8 palfrey 2007-11-15 14:48:22 UTC
*** Bug 497023 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 9 palfrey 2007-12-03 16:13:39 UTC
*** Bug 501244 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***