After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 464738 - IA__g_utf8_offset_to_pointer (str=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, offset=74) at gutf8.c:302 in gutf8.c
IA__g_utf8_offset_to_pointer (str=0x1 <Address 0x1 out of bounds>, offset=74)...
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: Evolution Exchange
Classification: Deprecated
Component: Connector
2.10.x
Other All
: Normal critical
: ---
Assigned To: Connector Maintainer
Ximian Connector QA
: 501392 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-08-08 15:31 UTC by Reid Thompson
Modified: 2008-03-02 17:05 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description Reid Thompson 2007-08-08 15:31:57 UTC
Steps to reproduce:
1. Unsure of reproduction
2. I generated a new compose message window via Firefox File/Send Link
3. Started to enter an email address
4. rec'd segfault


Stack trace:
(evolution-exchange:16856): libedata-book-WARNING **: impl_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_Book_getBookView ((or (beginswith "file_as"  "jre") (beginswith "full_name"  "jre") (beginswith "email"  "jre") (beginswith "nickname"  "jre") ))

e_data_book_respond_get_book_view
[New Thread -1306100848 (LWP 26738)]

(evolution-exchange:16856): libedata-book-WARNING **: impl_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_Book_getBookView ((or (beginswith "file_as"  "jre") (beginswith "full_name"  "jre") (beginswith "email"  "jre") (beginswith "nickname"  "jre") ))

e_data_book_respond_get_book_view
start book view
Not marked for offline or cache not there
start_book_view (0x80ed520)
e-book-backend-gal.c(1786):: (&(mail=*)(!(msExchHideFromAddressLists=TRUE))(|(displayName=jre*)(|(displayName=jre*)(sn=jre*)(givenName=jre*)(mailNickname=jre*))(mail=jre*)(mailNickname=jre*)))
e-book-backend-gal.c(1799):: starting 
e-book-backend-gal.c(1810):: 0
adding search_op (0x80ed520, 3)
e-book-backend-gal.c(1830):: adding search 
looked up msgid 3, got op 0x88a3c40
ldap_search_handler (0x80ed520)
e-book-backend-gal.c(1575):: search handler 
e-book-backend-gal.c(1630):: o/p 0 0

(evolution-exchange:16856): libedata-book-WARNING **: impl_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_Book_getBookView ((or (beginswith "nickname"  "") (beginswith "email"  "") (beginswith "full_name"  "") (beginswith "file_as"  "") ))

e_data_book_respond_get_book_view
ldap_search_dtor (0x80ed520)
[New Thread -1297708144 (LWP 26744)]

(evolution-exchange:16856): e-book-backend-exchange-WARNING **: no email info for ""
stop_book_view (0x80ed520)

Program received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault.

Thread NaN (LWP 26736)

  • #0 IA__g_utf8_offset_to_pointer
    at gutf8.c line 302
  • #1 e_vcard_to_string
    at e-vcard.c line 899
  • #2 e_data_book_view_notify_update
    at e-data-book-view.c line 261
  • #3 e_book_backend_exchange_start_book_view
    at e-book-backend-exchange.c line 1945
  • #4 e_book_backend_start_book_view
    at e-book-backend.c line 305
  • #5 impl_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_BookView_start
    at e-data-book-view.c line 493
  • #6 _ORBIT_skel_small_GNOME_Evolution_Addressbook_BookView_start
    at Evolution-DataServer-Addressbook-common.c line 36
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/libORBit-2.so.0
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??

Other information:
rthompso@jhereg: ~/src/svn/evolution-exchange$ svn info
Path: .
URL: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution-exchange/trunk
Repository Root: http://svn.gnome.org/svn/evolution-exchange
Repository UUID: cbd800bf-df25-0410-b17b-96628719a9b0
Revision: 1410
Node Kind: directory
Schedule: normal
Last Changed Author: ituohela
Last Changed Rev: 1410
Last Changed Date: 2007-08-06 09:37:03 -0400 (Mon, 06 Aug 2007)
Comment 1 Tobias Mueller 2007-12-04 14:27:13 UTC
*** Bug 501392 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 Tobias Mueller 2007-12-04 14:28:54 UTC
Did you ever manage to reproduce this issue?
Comment 3 Reid Thompson 2007-12-04 17:27:58 UTC
I do not think I've had this one occur again.
Comment 4 Srinivasa Ragavan 2008-01-22 09:57:24 UTC
In 2.12 some of the GAL bits were rewritten. It may not happen. I would leave it as it is for some time before closing
Comment 5 Reid Thompson 2008-02-20 12:58:17 UTC
Appears to have been fixed
Comment 6 Tobias Mueller 2008-03-02 17:05:35 UTC
For the record: bug 509363 hits 2.12 and looks related.