After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 448636 - crash in Tasks: Using evolutions, openin...
crash in Tasks: Using evolutions, openin...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 444866
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-18 00:45 UTC by bhuffman
Modified: 2007-06-18 20:54 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18



Description bhuffman 2007-06-18 00:45:21 UTC
Version: 2.10

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Using evolutions, opening an IMAP message pointing to a Scalix mail server.  I am *not* using the Scalix connector - this was IMAP only.


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.2 2007-05-28 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3228.fc7 #1 SMP Tue Jun 12 15:37:31 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: Enforcing
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 131088384 vsize: 131088384 resident: 51544064 share: 33509376 rss: 51544064 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1182021533 rtime: 5088 utime: 4649 stime: 439 cutime:4 cstime: 9 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208826144 (LWP 3074)]
[New Thread -1304421488 (LWP 18254)]
[New Thread -1283441776 (LWP 18253)]
[New Thread -1230595184 (LWP 3342)]
[New Thread -1241482352 (LWP 3193)]
[New Thread -1219691632 (LWP 3149)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x003d7402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208826144 (LWP 3074))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 g_slist_free
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #12 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #13 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #14 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #15 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #16 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #17 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #19 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #20 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #21 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #22 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #23 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #24 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #25 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #26 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #27 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #28 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #29 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #30 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #31 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #32 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #33 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #34 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #35 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #36 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #37 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #38 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #39 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #40 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #41 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #42 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #43 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #44 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #45 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #46 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #47 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #48 g_object_run_dispose
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #49 gtk_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #50 gtk_widget_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #51 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #52 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #53 gtk_container_foreach
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #54 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #55 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #56 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #57 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #58 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #59 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #60 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #61 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #62 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #63 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #64 g_object_unref
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #65 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #66 g_value_unset
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #67 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #68 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #69 gtk_container_remove
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #70 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #71 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #72 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #73 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #74 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #75 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #76 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #77 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #78 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #79 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #80 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #81 html_object_destroy
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #82 html_engine_parse
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #83 gtk_html_begin_full
    from /usr/lib/libgtkhtml-3.14.so.19
  • #84 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #85 ??
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.10/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #86 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #87 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #88 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #89 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #90 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #91 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall


----------- .xsession-errors (7 sec old) ---------------------
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgnome-2.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libxml2.so.2" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libnm_glib.so.0" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libsoup-2.2.so.8" is not at the expected address
warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-06-18 20:54:47 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444866 ***