After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 446745 - crash in Tasks: I have no idea!
crash in Tasks: I have no idea!
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 444924
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Tasks
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-calendar-maintainers
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-06-12 14:02 UTC by chandlerblum
Modified: 2007-06-12 16:18 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.17/2.18


Description chandlerblum 2007-06-12 14:02:06 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
I have no idea!


Distribution: Fedora release 7 (Moonshine)
Gnome Release: 2.18.0 2007-03-23 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.18.0

System: Linux 2.6.21-1.3194.fc7 #1 SMP Wed May 23 22:35:01 EDT 2007 i686
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 10300000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled
GTK+ Theme: Clearlooks
Icon Theme: Fedora

Memory status: size: 137469952 vsize: 137469952 resident: 35151872 share: 20754432 rss: 35151872 rss_rlim: 4294967295
CPU usage: start_time: 1181656632 rtime: 510 utime: 482 stime: 28 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208748320 (LWP 1044)]
[New Thread -1293943920 (LWP 1065)]
[New Thread -1229034608 (LWP 1063)]
[New Thread -1250018416 (LWP 1052)]
[New Thread -1239524464 (LWP 1051)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00e85402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 140351

Thread 1 (Thread -1208748320 (LWP 1044))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 ??
  • #4 <signal handler called>
  • #5 g_slice_free_chain_with_offset
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #6 g_slist_free
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #7 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 g_hash_table_foreach
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #9 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #13 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #14 g_closure_invoke
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #15 ??
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #16 g_signal_emit_valist
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #17 g_signal_emit
    from /lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
  • #18 ??
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #20 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #21 ??
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #22 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #23 bonobo_main
    from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
  • #24 main
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall 


----------- .xsession-errors (518749 sec old) ---------------------
  - Try a different -vo driver (-vo help for a list) or try -framedrop!
- Slow CPU
  - Don't try to play a big DVD/DivX on a slow CPU! Try some of the lavdopts,
    e.g. -vfm ffmpeg -lavdopts lowres=1:fast:skiploopfilter=all.
- Broken file
  - Try various combinations of -nobps -ni -forceidx -mc 0.
- Slow media (NFS/SMB mounts, DVD, VCD etc)
  - Try -cache 8192.
- Are you using -cache to play a non-interleaved AVI file?
  - Try -nocache.
Read DOCS/HTML/en/video.html for tuning/speedup tips.
If none of this helps you, read DOCS/HTML/en/bugreports.html.
A:   7.4 V:   6.0 A-V:  1.446 ct:  0.024 180/180 62%  7%  2.1% 51 0             
A:   7.5 V:   6.0 A-V:  1.455 ct:  0.024 181/181 62%  7%  2.1% 52 0             
A:   7.5 V:   6.0 A-V:  1.465 ct:  0.0
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 palfrey 2007-06-12 16:18:06 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 444924 ***