After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 442074 - Navigation bar for photo view
Navigation bar for photo view
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 325850
Product: f-spot
Classification: Other
Component: Browsing
SVN
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: F-spot maintainers
F-spot maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-05-29 14:07 UTC by Michael Monreal
Modified: 2007-07-16 09:44 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
Mockup (175.80 KB, image/jpeg)
2007-05-29 14:14 UTC, Michael Monreal 		Details

Description Michael Monreal 2007-05-29 14:07:08 UTC 
In the photo view, the date bar is not of much use. It just allows to jump month-wise, with no real indication what photos are found in a given month. In the browse mode, this is no problem because you instantly see a large number of photos.

Additionally, what's missing in the photo view is the possibility to see a few photos back or ahead of the current, to help navigation.

So, what I would like to see is a new kind of preview/navigation bar in the photo view. Similar to what currently is in the f-spot view sidebar.
Comment 1 Michael Monreal 2007-05-29 14:14:22 UTC 
Created attachment 89006 [details]
Mockup

This is how it could look like. The space where we currently have the time bar would be replaced by this bar, which holds thumbnails of the current image, as well as some images before, and some after it. The current image thumbnail is always in the middle and has the slider thing around it. When you move the slider to the left, the stripe of thumbnails starts scrolling to the right. Moving it just a little results in slow scrolling, moving it very far to either side results in fast scrolling. The ends of the bar fade into gray to show "open ended".
Comment 2 Stephane Delcroix 2007-07-16 09:44:14 UTC 
Hi Michael,

I already started implemented this, and attached my work to bug #325850. Please refer to that one for further discussions.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 325850 ***