GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 437958
crash in Calculator: Comparison of AT-SPI sta...
Last modified: 2007-09-13 02:36:23 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed? Comparison of AT-SPI state sets Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) Gnome Release: 2.16.3 2007-01-31 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 System: Linux 2.6.20-1.2948.fc6 #1 SMP Fri Apr 27 19:48:40 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 70101000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Enabled Memory status: size: 50688000 vsize: 0 resident: 50688000 share: 0 rss: 13053952 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1178995146 rtime: 0 utime: 33 stime: 0 cutime:28 cstime: 0 timeout: 5 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gcalctool' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208624928 (LWP 11019)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x001f4402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 133834
Thread 1 (Thread -1208624928 (LWP 11019))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- GTK Accessibility Module initialized Bonobo accessibility support initialized ** (bug-buddy:10630): WARNING **: Couldn't load icon for Open Folder GTK Accessibility Module initialized Bonobo accessibility support initialized ** ERROR **: file base.c: line 74 (spi_base_construct): assertion failed: (G_IS_OBJECT (gobject)) aborting... GTK Accessibility Module initialized Bonobo accessibility support initialized GTK Accessibility Module initialized Bonobo accessibility support initialized ** (bug-buddy:11072): WARNING **: Couldn't load icon for Open Folder --------------------------------------------------
I believe this is a libspi bug. I'm experimenting with implementing AT-SPI StateSets in Python for the new Collection interface. When I ask a StateSet object created by the bridge to compare itself to my Python implementation, gcalc crashes.
Peter, I don't see libspi as a GNOME Bugzilla product (or as a component of at-spi). Where should this be refiled?
You're right. No libspi component. I guess it's best to put it under "general" and let Li or Bill decide where to move it. I'll go ahead and re-file it.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 467612 ***