GNOME Bugzilla – Bug 430243
crash in Terminal: rebooting the computer
Last modified: 2007-04-16 14:32:49 UTC
Version: 2.16.0 What were you doing when the application crashed? rebooting the computer Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod) Gnome Release: 2.16.3 2007-01-31 (Red Hat, Inc) BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0 System: Linux 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 #1 SMP Mon Mar 19 11:38:26 EDT 2007 i686 X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation X Vendor Release: 70101000 Selinux: No Accessibility: Disabled Memory status: size: 69210112 vsize: 0 resident: 69210112 share: 0 rss: 18890752 rss_rlim: 0 CPU usage: start_time: 1176713009 rtime: 0 utime: 739 stime: 0 cutime:588 cstime: 0 timeout: 151 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 1 Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal' (no debugging symbols found) Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1". (no debugging symbols found) [Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled] [New Thread -1208596784 (LWP 2947)] [New Thread -1216193648 (LWP 2950)] (no debugging symbols found) 0x0078a402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()
+ Trace 128173
Thread 1 (Thread -1208596784 (LWP 2947))
----------- .xsession-errors --------------------- warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libX11.so.6" is not at the expected address warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libgssapi_krb5.so.2" is not at the expected address warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libkrb5.so.3" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libk5crypto.so.3" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations warning: .dynamic section for "/usr/lib/libkrb5support.so.0" is not at the expected address warning: difference appears to be caused by prelink, adjusting expectations --------------------------------------------------
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 161843 ***