After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 424826 - crash in Computer: brought up 2 new nautilu...
crash in Computer: brought up 2 new nautilu...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 349551
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-03-31 11:45 UTC by Gavin Flower
Modified: 2007-03-31 13:02 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description Gavin Flower 2007-03-31 11:45:59 UTC 
Version: 2.16.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
brought up 2 new nautilus directory views of my home, clicked on the first, got this dialgoue...


Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.3 2007-01-31 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 #1 SMP Mon Mar 19 11:00:19 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70101000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled

Memory status: size: 494350336 vsize: 494350336 resident: 26693632 share: 15532032 rss: 26693632 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1175288536 rtime: 1334 utime: 1029 stime: 305 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496437200 (LWP 14540)]
0x00000036bca0d96f in __libc_waitpid (pid=8422, stat_loc=0x7fffd1a7543c, 
    options=0) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:41
41	  int result = INLINE_SYSCALL (wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL);

+ Trace 123790

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496437200 (LWP 14540))

  • #0 __libc_waitpid
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c line 41
  • #1 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 870
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 IA__gtk_ui_manager_remove_ui
    at gtkuimanager.c line 1753
  • #4 nautilus_ui_unmerge_ui
    at nautilus-ui-utilities.c line 38
  • #5 real_update_menus
    at fm-directory-view.c line 4637
  • #6 fm_directory_view_update_menus
    at fm-directory-view.c line 9360
  • #7 update_menus_timeout_callback
    at fm-directory-view.c line 2928
  • #8 g_timeout_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 3422
  • #9 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2045
  • #10 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2677
  • #11 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2881
  • #12 IA__gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1148
  • #13 main
    at nautilus-main.c line 389
  • #14 __libc_start_main
    at libc-start.c line 231
  • #15 _start 
0x00000036bca0d96f	41	  int result = INLINE_SYSCALL (wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL);


----------- .xsession-errors (358497 sec old) ---------------------
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Window manager warning: last_user_time (4128545152) is greater than comparison timestamp (2456915482).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
Window manage
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-31 13:02:27 UTC 
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349551 ***