After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 424825 - crash in Computer: selected a zip file and ...
crash in Computer: selected a zip file and ...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 349551
Product: nautilus
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Nautilus Maintainers
Nautilus Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-03-31 11:45 UTC by Gavin Flower
Modified: 2007-03-31 13:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description Gavin Flower 2007-03-31 11:45:58 UTC
Version: 2.16.2

What were you doing when the application crashed?
selected a zip file and the corressponding directory
pressed the delete key...
then this dialog poped up


Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.3 2007-01-31 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

System: Linux 2.6.20-1.2933.fc6 #1 SMP Mon Mar 19 11:00:19 EDT 2007 x86_64
X Vendor: The X.Org Foundation
X Vendor Release: 70101000
Selinux: No
Accessibility: Disabled

Memory status: size: 525910016 vsize: 525910016 resident: 47206400 share: 16666624 rss: 47206400 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1174848297 rtime: 4007 utime: 3322 stime: 685 cutime:0 cstime: 5 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib64/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 46912496437200 (LWP 13090)]
0x00000034f7e0d96f in __libc_waitpid (pid=14505, stat_loc=0x7ffff2697eac, 
    options=0) at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c:41
41	  int result = INLINE_SYSCALL (wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL);

Thread 1 (Thread 46912496437200 (LWP 13090))

  • #0 __libc_waitpid
    at ../sysdeps/unix/sysv/linux/waitpid.c line 41
  • #1 libgnomeui_segv_handle
    at gnome-ui-init.c line 870
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 IA__gtk_ui_manager_remove_ui
    at gtkuimanager.c line 1753
  • #4 nautilus_ui_unmerge_ui
    at nautilus-ui-utilities.c line 38
  • #5 real_update_menus
    at fm-directory-view.c line 4637
  • #6 fm_directory_view_update_menus
    at fm-directory-view.c line 9360
  • #7 update_menus_timeout_callback
    at fm-directory-view.c line 2928
  • #8 g_timeout_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 3422
  • #9 IA__g_main_context_dispatch
    at gmain.c line 2045
  • #10 g_main_context_iterate
    at gmain.c line 2677
  • #11 IA__g_main_loop_run
    at gmain.c line 2881
  • #12 IA__gtk_main
    at gtkmain.c line 1148
  • #13 main
    at nautilus-main.c line 389
  • #14 __libc_start_main
    at libc-start.c line 231
  • #15 _start
0x00000034f7e0d96f	41	  int result = INLINE_SYSCALL (wait4, 4, pid, stat_loc, options, NULL);


----------- .xsession-errors (305402 sec old) ---------------------
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Xlib:  extension "SHAPE" missing on display ":0.0".
Window manager warning: last_user_time (4128545152) is greater than comparison timestamp (2456915482).  This most likely represents a buggy client sending inaccurate timestamps in messages such as _NE
Window manage
...Too much output, ignoring rest...
--------------------------------------------------
Comment 1 Pedro Villavicencio 2007-03-31 13:03:33 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but we are happy to tell you that the problem has already been fixed. It should be solved in the next software version. You may want to check for a software upgrade.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 349551 ***