Bug 411964 – crash in Open Folder: acessando um arquivament...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 411964 - crash in Open Folder: acessando um arquivament...


Summary:	crash in Open Folder: acessando um arquivament...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357939

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-02-25 17:50 UTC by maurocesar
Modified:	2007-02-28 16:29 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description maurocesar 2007-02-25 17:50:10 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
acessando um arquivamento


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 185704448 vsize: 0 resident: 185704448 share: 0 rss: 47771648 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1172401268 rtime: 0 utime: 27740 stime: 0 cutime:25023 cstime: 0 timeout: 2717 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 16847

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226783056 (LWP 4464)]
[New Thread -1237230688 (LWP 22080)]
[New Thread -1285731424 (LWP 12111)]
[New Thread -1273246816 (LWP 12110)]
[New Thread -1332008032 (LWP 12109)]
[New Thread -1315210336 (LWP 12108)]
[New Thread -1323603040 (LWP 12107)]
[New Thread -1306817632 (LWP 12106)]
[New Thread -1264854112 (LWP 7832)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 113813

Thread 2 (Thread -1237230688 (LWP 22080))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 __assert_fail
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8 cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#9 cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#10 pango_cairo_fc_font_get_type
from /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
#11 pango_fc_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
#12 script_engine_init
from /usr/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
#13 pango_coverage_new
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 pango_shape
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#15 pango_layout_set_width
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#16 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#17 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#18 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#19 pango_layout_get_pixel_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#20 rsvg_error_get_type
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#21 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#22 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#23 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#24 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#25 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#26 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#27 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#28 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#29 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#30 rsvg_handle_render_cairo_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#31 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#32 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#33 fill_info
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#34 ??
#35 ??

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-02-28 16:29:33 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357939 ***