Bug 409909 – crash in Computer: right clicking on an ico...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 409909 - crash in Computer: right clicking on an ico...


Summary:	crash in Computer: right clicking on an ico...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 361276

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	409916 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-02-20 07:15 UTC by matt-ubuntu
Modified:	2007-02-20 17:18 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description matt-ubuntu 2007-02-20 07:15:14 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
right clicking on an icon in Nautilus


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 126222336 vsize: 0 resident: 126222336 share: 0 rss: 44388352 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1171829174 rtime: 0 utime: 11820 stime: 0 cutime:10367 cstime: 0 timeout: 1453 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 476

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226467664 (LWP 764)]
[New Thread -1266148448 (LWP 14064)]
[New Thread -1244496992 (LWP 784)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 112228

Thread 2 (Thread -1266148448 (LWP 14064))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 __assert_fail
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8 cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#9 cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#10 pango_cairo_fc_font_get_type
from /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
#11 pango_fc_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
#12 script_engine_init
from /usr/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
#13 pango_coverage_new
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 pango_shape
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#15 pango_layout_set_width
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#16 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#17 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#18 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#19 pango_layout_get_pixel_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#20 pango_layout_get_pixel_size
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#21 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#22 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#23 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#24 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#25 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#26 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#27 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#28 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#29 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#30 rsvg_handle_render_cairo_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#31 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#32 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#33 fill_info
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#34 ??
#35 ??

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-02-20 17:17:48 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 361276 ***

Comment 2 palfrey 2007-02-20 17:18:00 UTC

*** Bug 409916 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***