After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 402994 - crash in Evolution: looking at picture attac...
crash in Evolution: looking at picture attac...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 340165
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: general
2.8.x (obsolete)
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
Evolution QA team
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-31 21:49 UTC by mike.collins
Modified: 2007-02-09 07:43 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description mike.collins 2007-01-31 21:49:26 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
looking at picture attachments


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 289624064 vsize: 289624064 resident: 36618240 share: 19607552 rss: 36618240 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1170279983 rtime: 1134 utime: 1066 stime: 68 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47455078174064 (LWP 9436)]
[New Thread 1115969872 (LWP 9450)]
[New Thread 1115703632 (LWP 9449)]
[New Thread 1098918224 (LWP 9446)]
[New Thread 1090525520 (LWP 9445)]
[New Thread 1082132816 (LWP 9440)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b28fac7d5cf in waitpid () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 6 (Thread 1082132816 (LWP 9440))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 5 (Thread 1090525520 (LWP 9445))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 4 (Thread 1098918224 (LWP 9446))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #3 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #4 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #5 ??

Thread 3 (Thread 1115703632 (LWP 9449))

  • #0 select
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #1 e_msgport_wait
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #2 em_sync_stream_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #3 em_sync_stream_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #4 em_format_html_display_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #5 em_format_part_as
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #6 em_format_part
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #7 em_format_get_type
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #8 em_format_part_as
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #9 em_format_part
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #10 em_format_html_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #11 em_format_html_new
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #12 mail_enable_stop
    from /usr/lib/evolution/2.8/components/libevolution-mail.so
  • #13 e_msgport_reply
    from /usr/lib64/libedataserver-1.2.so.7
  • #14 start_thread
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #15 clone
    from /lib/libc.so.6
  • #16 ??

Comment 1 palfrey 2007-02-01 12:57:16 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
Unfortunately, that stack trace is missing some elements that will help a lot to solve the problem, so it will be hard for the developers to fix that crash. Can you get us a stack trace with debugging symbols? Please see http://live.gnome.org/GettingTraces for more information on how to do so. Thanks in advance!
Comment 2 Kjartan Maraas 2007-02-09 07:43:56 UTC
Likely a duplicate of bug 340165 or 333864. Fixed in 2.8.3 and 2.9.x

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 340165 ***