After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 399418 - evolution displays quota warning dialog every time I switch messages
evolution displays quota warning dialog every time I switch messages
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: evolution
Classification: Applications
Component: Mailer
unspecified
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: evolution-mail-maintainers
Evolution QA team
: 494961 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2007-01-22 15:27 UTC by Ray Strode [halfline]
Modified: 2009-08-26 09:59 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---


Description Ray Strode [halfline] 2007-01-22 15:27:37 UTC 
I've recently started filling up my mailbox quota.  According to evolution I've hit 90% of my quota, in fact.  I think it's great that evolution warns me about this, but it does it way too frequently.  Any time I do anything that talks to the mail server the dialog pops up again (switching messages in a folder makes it pop up, emptying the trash makes it pop up, switching folders makes it pop up).

This may be because the imap server is configured to report the quota warning after every operation--I don't know.  It would be nice if evolution handled it a bit better though.
Comment 1 Matthew Barnes 2007-09-05 20:28:53 UTC 
Yeah, it's the IMAP server being chatty.  We're working on a less intrusive way of handling this for Evolution 2.14 / GNOME 2.22.

See: http://www.go-evolution.org/NonIntrusiveError
Comment 2 Milan Crha 2008-06-05 17:36:21 UTC 
Right, it's included in gnome-2-22 and based on the code, it should be hidden in the status bar, not shown as a popup dialog, now on.
Comment 3 Akhil Laddha 2009-08-26 05:42:11 UTC 
*** Bug 494961 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 Akhil Laddha 2009-08-26 05:44:12 UTC 
Do we want to keep this bug open ?