Bug 396844 – crash in CD/DVD Creator: je lançais une recherche...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 396844 - crash in CD/DVD Creator: je lançais une recherche...


Summary:	crash in CD/DVD Creator: je lançais une recherche...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 365750

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2007-01-15 12:46 UTC by sylfurd
Modified:	2007-01-16 15:48 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description sylfurd 2007-01-15 12:46:34 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
je lançais une recherche avec nautilus sur une partition ntfs montée en ntfs-3g

I launched a file search with nautilus on a ntfs partition mounted with ntfs-3g


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 127660032 vsize: 0 resident: 127660032 share: 0 rss: 46510080 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1168849989 rtime: 0 utime: 1256 stime: 0 cutime:1116 cstime: 0 timeout: 140 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226979664 (LWP 5144)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 102362

Thread 1 (Thread -1226979664 (LWP 5144))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 nautilus_file_get_uri
#5 nautilus_file_get_parent_uri
#6 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#7 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#8 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#9 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#10 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#11 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#12 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#13 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#14 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#15 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#16 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#17 g_list_foreach
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#18 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#19 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#20 fm_directory_view_bump_zoom_level
#21 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#22 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#23 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#24 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 nautilus_directory_async_state_changed
#27 nautilus_marshal_BOOLEAN__POINTER
#28 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#30 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#31 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#32 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#33 nautilus_marshal_BOOLEAN__POINTER
#34 nautilus_marshal_BOOLEAN__POINTER
#35 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#37 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#38 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#39 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#40 POA_Nautilus_MetafileMonitor__init
#41 __libc_start_main
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#42 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2007-01-16 15:48:53 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 365750 ***