After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 387507 - line 292, in __get_match_icon_for_cell: Unpack non sequence
line 292, in __get_match_icon_for_cell: Unpack non sequence
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 359251
Product: deskbar-applet
Classification: Deprecated
Component: general
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Deskbar Applet Maintainer(s)
Deskbar Applet Maintainer(s)
: 387908 389800 389895 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-12-19 13:12 UTC by whiteslug
Modified: 2007-01-07 17:00 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16


Description whiteslug 2006-12-19 13:12:15 UTC 
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Typing something in


Distribution: openSUSE 10.2 (i586)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-11-28 (SUSE)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 0 vsize: 0 resident: 0 share: 0 rss: 0 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 0 rtime: 0 utime: 0 stime: 0 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Traceback (most recent call last):

+ Trace 95387

  • File "/opt/gnome/lib/python2.5/site-packages/deskbar/ui/cuemiac/CuemiacTreeView.py", line 292 in __get_match_icon_for_cell
TypeError: unpack non-sequence 






Comment 1


Susana





          2006-12-20 19:18:15 UTC
        



*** Bug 387908 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 2


Susana





          2006-12-26 19:08:06 UTC
        



*** Bug 389800 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 3


Susana





          2006-12-27 12:05:30 UTC
        



*** Bug 389895 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***






Comment 4


André Klapper





          2007-01-07 01:14:22 UTC
        



Susana, looks like a duplicate of bug 359251 to me - what do you think?






Comment 5


Susana





          2007-01-07 16:57:31 UTC
        



Andre, I think you're right. However, Raphael changed the bug summary and he didn't mark it as a dup.

Raphael, is this a dup of bug 359251?






Comment 6


Raphael Slinckx





          2007-01-07 17:00:37 UTC
        



It is indeed :)

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 359251 ***