After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 378534 - crash in GNOME Commander: This Error was when look...
crash in GNOME Commander: This Error was when look...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 376909
Product: gnome-commander
Classification: Other
Component: application
1.2.x
Other All
: High critical
: 1.2.2
Assigned To: epiotr
epiotr
: 378895 400739 400758 407197 407209 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-11-23 16:37 UTC by droid0x9
Modified: 2007-02-14 15:28 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description droid0x9 2006-11-23 16:37:28 UTC
Version: 1.2.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
This Error was when looking for *.mp3 files on my /media/hda3


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 256188416 vsize: 256188416 resident: 134311936 share: 11309056 rss: 134311936 rss_rlim: -1
CPU usage: start_time: 1164299715 rtime: 1717 utime: 1313 stime: 404 cutime:0 cstime: 0 timeout: 0 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 100

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-commander'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread 47701005146464 (LWP 10809)]
[New Thread 1082132816 (LWP 10812)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x00002b6240e9c7f6 in poll () from /lib/libc.so.6

Thread 2 (Thread 1082132816 (LWP 10812))

  • #0 waitpid
    from /lib/libpthread.so.0
  • #1 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #2 <signal handler called>
  • #3 g_str_hash
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #4 g_hash_table_insert
    from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #17 ??
  • #18 ??
  • #19 ??
  • #20 ??
  • #21 ??
  • #22 ??
  • #23 ??

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-11-27 17:50:38 UTC
*** Bug 378895 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 2 André Klapper 2006-11-27 21:00:34 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 376909 ***
Comment 3 epiotr 2007-01-25 22:52:29 UTC
*** Bug 400739 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 4 epiotr 2007-01-25 22:52:56 UTC
*** Bug 400758 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 5 Susana 2007-02-14 15:27:41 UTC
*** Bug 407197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
Comment 6 Susana 2007-02-14 15:28:53 UTC
*** Bug 407209 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***