Bug 377038 – crash in System Log: I simply started it, but...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 377038 - crash in System Log: I simply started it, but...


Summary:	crash in System Log: I simply started it, but...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 364106

Product:	gnome-utils
Classification:	Deprecated
Component:	logview
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	gnome-utils Maintainers
QA Contact:	gnome-utils Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-11-19 16:46 UTC by H.
Modified:	2006-11-20 01:00 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description H. 2006-11-19 16:46:13 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I simply started it, but it crashed


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 32043008 vsize: 0 resident: 32043008 share: 0 rss: 13205504 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1163954732 rtime: 0 utime: 29 stime: 0 cutime:25 cstime: 0 timeout: 4 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-system-log'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1224607552 (LWP 12369)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 87731

Thread 1 (Thread -1224607552 (LWP 12369))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 ??
#5 ??
#6 ??
#7 ??
#8 g_free
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#9 ??
#10 ??
#11 ??
#12 ??
#13 ??
#14 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 H. 2006-11-19 18:16:14 UTC

It's reproducable every time.

Comment 2 Susana 2006-11-20 01:00:57 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 364106 ***