Bug 376254 – crash in File Browser:

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 376254 - crash in File Browser:


Summary:	crash in File Browser:


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357939

Product:	nautilus
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	unspecified
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Nautilus Maintainers
QA Contact:	Nautilus Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-11-17 10:42 UTC by damjan.cvetko
Modified:	2006-11-17 22:51 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description damjan.cvetko 2006-11-17 10:42:54 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?



Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 172720128 vsize: 0 resident: 172720128 share: 0 rss: 63021056 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1163669123 rtime: 0 utime: 26870 stime: 0 cutime:19833 cstime: 0 timeout: 7037 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 576

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/nautilus'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226414416 (LWP 4716)]
[New Thread -1242887264 (LWP 16356)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 87172

Thread 2 (Thread -1242887264 (LWP 16356))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 __assert_fail
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8 cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#9 cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#10 pango_cairo_fc_font_get_type
from /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
#11 pango_fc_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
#12 script_engine_init
from /usr/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
#13 pango_coverage_new
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 pango_shape
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#15 pango_layout_set_width
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#16 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#17 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#18 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#19 pango_layout_get_pixel_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#20 pango_layout_get_pixel_size
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#21 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#22 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#23 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#24 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#25 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#26 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#27 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#28 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#29 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#30 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#31 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#32 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#33 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#34 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#35 rsvg_handle_render_cairo_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#36 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#37 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#38 fill_info
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#39 ??
#40 ??

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-11-17 22:51:16 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357939 ***