Bug 369167 – crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Trying to edit an irc se...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 369167 - crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Trying to edit an irc se...


Summary:	crash in XChat-GNOME IRC Chat: Trying to edit an irc se...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 359167

Product:	xchat-gnome
Classification:	Other
Component:	general
Version:	0.13
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	xchat-gnome maintainers
QA Contact:	xchat-gnome maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-11-02 00:43 UTC by jvitosky
Modified:	2006-11-02 00:54 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description jvitosky 2006-11-02 00:43:45 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Trying to edit an irc server in xchat-gnome


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 106844160 vsize: 0 resident: 106844160 share: 0 rss: 19759104 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162427664 rtime: 0 utime: 926 stime: 0 cutime:862 cstime: 0 timeout: 64 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 3

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/xchat-gnome'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226840400 (LWP 5912)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 81690

Thread 1 (Thread -1226840400 (LWP 5912))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 navigation_model_get_server
#5 irc_network_save
#6 irc_network_editor_new
#7 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_dialog_response
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_dialog_response
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#37 fe_main
#38 main
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 David Trowbridge 2006-11-02 00:54:34 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 359167 ***