Bug 367473 – crash in Evolution: again tried to fold in a...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 367473 - crash in Evolution: again tried to fold in a...


Summary:	crash in Evolution: again tried to fold in a...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 308062

Product:	evolution
Classification:	Applications
Component:	general
Version:	2.8.x (obsolete)
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	Evolution Shell Maintainers Team
QA Contact:	Evolution QA team

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	367470 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-30 08:22 UTC by Philipp Dreimann
Modified:	2006-10-30 10:24 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description Philipp Dreimann 2006-10-30 08:22:02 UTC

What were you doing when the application crashed?
again tried to fold in an attached image, now with debugging symbols!


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 281165824 vsize: 0 resident: 281165824 share: 0 rss: 161038336 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162196451 rtime: 0 utime: 2053 stime: 0 cutime:1987 cstime: 0 timeout: 66 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/evolution-2.8'

Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1232886096 (LWP 10045)]
[New Thread -1336902752 (LWP 10055)]
[New Thread -1328112736 (LWP 10054)]
[New Thread -1287783520 (LWP 10050)]
[New Thread -1270604896 (LWP 10048)]
0xb7f78410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 80291

Thread 1 (Thread -1232886096 (LWP 10045))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 waitpid
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 segv_redirect
at main.c line 426
#4 <signal handler called>
#5 em_format_set_inline
at em-format.c line 978
#6 efhd_attachment_show
at em-format-html-display.c line 1416
#7 efhd_attachment_button_show
at em-format-html-display.c line 1422
#8 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#10 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#11 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#12 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_button_clicked
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_button_set_alignment
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__VOID
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#16 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#17 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#18 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#19 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#20 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_button_released
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 _gtk_marshal_BOOLEAN__BOXED
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 g_value_set_boxed
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#25 g_closure_invoke
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#26 g_signal_chain_from_overridden
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#27 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#28 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#29 gtk_widget_get_default_style
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#30 gtk_propagate_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#31 gtk_main_do_event
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#32 _gdk_events_init
from /usr/lib/libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0
#33 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#34 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#35 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#36 bonobo_main
from /usr/lib/libbonobo-2.so.0
#37 main
at main.c line 615
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-30 10:22:48 UTC

*** Bug 367470 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 2 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-30 10:24:04 UTC

Thanks Philipp, good stacktrace. :)


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 308062 ***