After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 366069 - crash in Terminal: vi /etc/fstab
crash in Terminal: vi /etc/fstab
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 353498
Product: gnome-terminal
Classification: Core
Component: general
2.16.x
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: GNOME Terminal Maintainers
GNOME Terminal Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-28 03:14 UTC by wgrammar
Modified: 2006-10-28 08:26 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description wgrammar 2006-10-28 03:14:09 UTC
Version: 2.16.0

What were you doing when the application crashed?
vi /etc/fstab


Distribution: Fedora Core release 6 (Zod)
Gnome Release: 2.16.0 2006-09-04 (Red Hat, Inc)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 138977280 vsize: 0 resident: 138977280 share: 0 rss: 17440768 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1162003834 rtime: 0 utime: 245 stime: 0 cutime:169 cstime: 0 timeout: 76 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/i686/nosegneg/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1208932656 (LWP 3428)]
[New Thread -1254896752 (LWP 3432)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0x009ce402 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1208932656 (LWP 3428))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 gtk_style_detach
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #5 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #6 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #7 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #8 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #9 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #10 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #11 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #12 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #13 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #14 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #15 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #16 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #17 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #18 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #19 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #20 gtk_container_forall
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #21 gtk_widget_set_usize
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #22 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #23 gtk_rc_get_module_dir
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #24 gtk_icon_info_get_type
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #25 g_source_is_destroyed
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #26 g_main_context_dispatch
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #27 g_main_context_check
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #28 g_main_loop_run
    from /lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
  • #29 gtk_main
    from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
  • #30 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #31 __libc_start_main
    from /lib/i686/nosegneg/libc.so.6
  • #32 g_cclosure_marshal_VOID__OBJECT
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Mariano Suárez-Alvarez 2006-10-28 04:13:14 UTC
Probably the same issue as bug 353498, but rather different stack.
Comment 2 Fabio Bonelli 2006-10-28 08:26:00 UTC
Thanks for taking the time to report this bug.
This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report in order to help the developers?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 353498 ***