Bug 365251 – crash in Terminal: I don't know what crashe...

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 365251 - crash in Terminal: I don't know what crashe...


Summary:	crash in Terminal: I don't know what crashe...


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 348979

Product:	gnome-terminal
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers
QA Contact:	GNOME Terminal Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-26 12:02 UTC by The Doctor What
Modified:	2006-11-01 23:34 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description The Doctor What 2006-10-26 12:02:27 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
I don't know what crashed.  I wasn't here and this tool isn't telling me what died.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 87461888 vsize: 0 resident: 87461888 share: 0 rss: 14794752 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1161642492 rtime: 0 utime: 1633 stime: 0 cutime:1326 cstime: 0 timeout: 307 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 20322

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/gnome-terminal'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1226533200 (LWP 6175)]
[New Thread -1278166112 (LWP 6211)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 78417

Thread 1 (Thread -1226533200 (LWP 6175))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 g_type_check_is_value_type
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#5 g_value_type_compatible
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#6 g_object_class_override_property
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#7 g_signal_emit_valist
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#8 g_signal_emit
from /usr/lib/libgobject-2.0.so.0
#9 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#10 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#11 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#12 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#13 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#14 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#15 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#16 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#17 gtk_notebook_popup_enable
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#18 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#19 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#20 gtk_box_pack_start_defaults
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#21 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#22 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#23 gtk_button_box_set_child_size
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#24 gtk_container_forall
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#25 gtk_widget_set_usize
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#26 gtk_widget_reset_rc_styles
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#27 gtk_rc_get_theme_dir
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#28 gtk_icon_info_get_type
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#29 g_source_is_destroyed
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#30 g_main_context_dispatch
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#31 g_main_context_check
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#32 g_main_loop_run
from /usr/lib/libglib-2.0.so.0
#33 gtk_main
from /usr/lib/libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0
#34 ??
#35 ??
#36 _IO_stdin_used
#37 ??
#38 ??
#0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 André Klapper 2006-10-26 13:42:50 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

This issue has been fixed already and the fix will be available in the next version.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348814 ***

Comment 2 Behdad Esfahbod 2006-11-01 23:34:03 UTC

Duping to correct bug.  Seems like 348979 was not a dupe of 348814 afterall.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 348979 ***