After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 362150 - crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: Viewing webcam (Logitech...
crash in Camorama Webcam Viewer: Viewing webcam (Logitech...
Status: RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 154867
Product: camorama
Classification: Deprecated
Component: User Interface
unspecified
Other All
: High critical
: ---
Assigned To: Camorama Maintainers
Camorama Maintainers
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-14 13:54 UTC by hackah
Modified: 2006-10-14 16:03 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: 2.15/2.16



Description hackah 2006-10-14 13:54:31 UTC
What were you doing when the application crashed?
Viewing webcam (Logitech QuickCam Messenger) in 'Large' and tried applying 'Laplace' effect. Only other effect enabled was 'Color correct'. Threshhold was at default 128, as well as all other adjustment settings.


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 70733824 vsize: 0 resident: 70733824 share: 0 rss: 13578240 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160833895 rtime: 0 utime: 91 stime: 0 cutime:81 cstime: 0 timeout: 10 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/camorama'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225697616 (LWP 16621)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

Thread 1 (Thread -1225697616 (LWP 16621))

  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall
  • #1 __waitpid_nocancel
    from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
  • #2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
    from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
  • #3 <signal handler called>
  • #4 ??
  • #5 ??
  • #6 ??
  • #7 ??
  • #8 ??
  • #9 ??
  • #10 ??
  • #11 ??
  • #12 ??
  • #13 ??
  • #14 ??
  • #15 ??
  • #16 ??
  • #0 __kernel_vsyscall

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-14 16:03:36 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 154867 ***