After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.
Bug 361757 - ROLE_LINK doesn't have a string defined for it
ROLE_LINK doesn't have a string defined for it
Status: RESOLVED FIXED
Product: atk
Classification: Platform
Component: atk
git master
Other Linux
: Normal normal
: ---
Assigned To: Patrick Wade
bill.haneman
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
 
Reported: 2006-10-12 17:23 UTC by Willie Walker
Modified: 2008-11-18 02:53 UTC
See Also:
GNOME target: ---
GNOME version: ---

Attachments
patch (556 bytes, patch)
2008-11-13 08:47 UTC, Li Yuan 		committed Details | Review

Description Willie Walker 2006-10-12 17:23:07 UTC 
When one looks at the role_items list in atkobject.c, they won't find an entry ATK_ROLE_LINK.  The impact of this is that getRoleName from the client will result in an empty string.
Comment 1 Willie Walker 2006-10-12 17:27:49 UTC 
The problem applies to ROLE_INPUT_METHOD_WINDOW.
Comment 2 Willie Walker 2006-10-12 17:36:38 UTC 
Sorry, I should say "also applies to ROLE_INPUT_METHOD_WINDOW".
Comment 3 Harry Lu 2007-02-15 09:32:06 UTC 
Patrick, please try to fix this bug, too. 
I think modify atkobject.c's role_items [] to add the names for ATK_ROLE_LINK, and ATK_ROLE_INPUT_METHOD_WINDOW should fix this bug.

But as GNOME 2.17/18 is already string freeze, the patch will be committed in 2.19/2.20.
Comment 4 Patrick Wade 2007-02-15 10:06:50 UTC 
Okay Harry.
Comment 5 Willie Walker 2007-10-11 12:41:13 UTC 
(In reply to comment #3)
> Patrick, please try to fix this bug, too. 
> I think modify atkobject.c's role_items [] to add the names for ATK_ROLE_LINK,
> and ATK_ROLE_INPUT_METHOD_WINDOW should fix this bug.
> 
> But as GNOME 2.17/18 is already string freeze, the patch will be committed in
> 2.19/2.20.
> 

Just ping'ing this one to see if it can get done for GNOME 2.20.1 and/or GNOME 2.21.1.
Comment 6 Li Yuan 2008-11-13 08:47:40 UTC 
Created attachment 122555 [details] [review]
patch