Bug 361597 – crash in Image Viewer: Opening an SVG File

After an evaluation, GNOME has moved from Bugzilla to GitLab. Learn more about GitLab.
No new issues can be reported in GNOME Bugzilla anymore.
To report an issue in a GNOME project, go to GNOME GitLab.
Do not go to GNOME Gitlab for: Bluefish, Doxygen, GnuCash, GStreamer, java-gnome, LDTP, NetworkManager, Tomboy.

Bug 361597 - crash in Image Viewer: Opening an SVG File


Summary:	crash in Image Viewer: Opening an SVG File


Status:	RESOLVED DUPLICATE of bug 357939

Product:	eog
Classification:	Core
Component:	general
Version:	2.16.x
Hardware:	Other All

Importance:	High critical
Target Milestone:	---
Assigned To:	EOG Maintainers
QA Contact:	EOG Maintainers

URL:
Whiteboard:

Duplicates:	379417 (view as bug list)
Depends on:
Blocks:

Reported:	2006-10-12 01:00 UTC by danielgtaylor
Modified:	2006-11-26 12:31 UTC

See Also:
GNOME target:	---
GNOME version:	2.15/2.16

Description danielgtaylor 2006-10-12 01:00:48 UTC

Version: 2.16.1

What were you doing when the application crashed?
Opening an SVG File


Distribution: Ubuntu 6.10 (edgy)
Gnome Release: 2.16.1 2006-10-02 (Ubuntu)
BugBuddy Version: 2.16.0

Memory status: size: 51736576 vsize: 0 resident: 51736576 share: 0 rss: 14241792 rss_rlim: 0
CPU usage: start_time: 1160614799 rtime: 0 utime: 125 stime: 0 cutime:80 cstime: 0 timeout: 45 it_real_value: 0 frequency: 0

Backtrace was generated from '/usr/bin/eog'

(no debugging symbols found)
Using host libthread_db library "/lib/tls/i686/cmov/libthread_db.so.1".
(no debugging symbols found)
[Thread debugging using libthread_db enabled]
[New Thread -1225975616 (LWP 5891)]
[New Thread -1248830560 (LWP 5893)]
[New Thread -1227486304 (LWP 5892)]
(no debugging symbols found)
0xffffe410 in __kernel_vsyscall ()

+ Trace 75918

Thread 2 (Thread -1248830560 (LWP 5893))

#0 __kernel_vsyscall
#1 __waitpid_nocancel
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libpthread.so.0
#2 gnome_gtk_module_info_get
from /usr/lib/libgnomeui-2.so.0
#3 <signal handler called>
#4 __kernel_vsyscall
#5 raise
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#6 abort
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#7 __assert_fail
from /lib/tls/i686/cmov/libc.so.6
#8 cairo_ft_scaled_font_unlock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#9 cairo_ft_scaled_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libcairo.so.2
#10 pango_cairo_fc_font_get_type
from /usr/lib/libpangocairo-1.0.so.0
#11 pango_fc_font_lock_face
from /usr/lib/libpangoft2-1.0.so.0
#12 script_engine_init
from /usr/lib/pango/1.5.0/modules/pango-basic-fc.so
#13 pango_coverage_new
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#14 pango_shape
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#15 pango_layout_set_width
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#16 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#17 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#18 pango_layout_iter_get_char_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#19 pango_layout_get_pixel_extents
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#20 pango_layout_get_pixel_size
from /usr/lib/libpango-1.0.so.0
#21 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#22 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#23 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#24 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#25 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#26 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#27 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#28 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#29 rsvg_handle_new_from_data
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#30 rsvg_handle_render_cairo_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#31 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf_sub
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#32 rsvg_handle_get_pixbuf
from /usr/lib/librsvg-2.so.2
#33 fill_info
from /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.10.0/loaders/svg_loader.so
#34 ??
#35 ??

Comment 1 Karsten Bräckelmann 2006-10-12 01:08:07 UTC

Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug has already been reported into our bug tracking system, but please feel free to report any further bugs you find.

Also, the maintainers need more information to fix the bug. Could you please answer the questions in the other report?


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 357939 ***

Comment 2 Bruno Boaventura 2006-11-26 12:31:55 UTC

*** Bug 379417 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***